To ask the Minister for Regional Development why the cost per trip varies between rural community transport partnerships.

Based upon the information that has been provided to my Department by the Partnerships in audited accounts from previous years, the cost per trip does vary quite widely across the organisations. There may be a number of reasons for this variation. These may include the geographical size of each partnership area, the distance members live from the Partnership location and local services, and the administrative and operational costs. If, for example, we compare cost per miles provided, the position is very different. This suggests some provide longer trips for their members and others provide more trips for shorter distances. It has been suggested that my Department should allocate funding based on number of trips, but I would caution that this may not be the best option for a number of reasons.

My Department can, in accordance with the Transport (NI) Act 2011 provide grant funding to the Community Transport Partnerships for transport services. The policy aim is to supplement Public Transport services for those with a disability, the elderly or living in rural areas.

The decision on who gets the services and the frequency of trips is a matter for the Partnerships to determine. They are best placed to assess needs in their local areas. I would caution against simply looking at cost per trip in isolation without consideration of the needs of individuals who may require transport for longer distances.

I believe the Partnerships do provide a very valuable service but they must operate in as efficient way as possible. It is also important that funding takes account of relevant Procurement and EU Regulations. I would caution the member that if this doesn’t happen the current grant funding regime could be threatened.